Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Reiki article

was rejected. Again.

The reviewers did not like the study design.

This is 3 years of research, hundreds of Reiki sessions. What a disappointment. So I guess I toss the data. Right? Redesign the study, start over?

Or try one more journal. And redesign study anyway. The reviewers want an experimental group, but how do you separate out what is Reiki and what isn't? What if every human has inherent healing abilities, whether he or she has been educated on Reiki or not? How do you figure out what Reiki is?